Relationships · editorial rating

John & Julie Gottman

The Gottmans rest on real, peer-reviewed science, and their Four Horsemen framework holds up well. They lose honesty points for marketing a 90% plus prediction figure that critics showed was fit after the fact.

Editorial opinion: SG Score 77 out of 100. Verdict: EVIDENCE-BACKED. This is not a customer star rating and not a finding by a court.

Open the full interactive receipt · How the score is built · More in Relationships · Research library

Strengths

• Built on decades of peer-reviewed, longitudinal observation of real couples
• Concrete, teachable skills with named antidotes for each bad pattern
• Cheap entry points: a free app and a $179 recorded workshop

Weaknesses

• Slate showed the high accuracy came from equations fit after the outcomes were already known (S4).
• Andrew Gelman's analysis reached the same limit: the divorce-prediction claim was not validated on a new sample (S10).
• The Gottman Institute lists the live virtual workshop at $599 to $799 per couple (S6).

Claims

1. partly. Gottman could predict whether a couple would divorce with an average of over 90% accuracy, across studies.

   The peer-reviewed studies do link conflict patterns to later breakup. But Slate's Laurie Abraham showed the high accuracy came from equations fit after outcomes were known in small samples (57 couples in the 1998 study), never tested on a fresh sample.

   Sources: R31 R32 S4

2. partly. The magic ratio is 5 to 1: a stable and happy marriage has five or more positive interactions for every negative one during conflict.

   The ratio comes from observing couples in the Gottman labs and describes what stable couples did during conflict. It is a useful rule of thumb, not a tested target that couples can hit to prevent divorce.

   Sources: R31 R32 S3

3. holds. The existence of contempt is the biggest predictor of divorce.

   Contempt and the other Horsemen are among the most replicated predictors in Gottman's longitudinal work, published in peer-reviewed journals.

   Sources: R31 R32

Also in Relationships

• Esther Perel (73, MIXED)

Sources

1. S1 John and Julie Gottman. The Gottman Institute. https://www.gottman.com/about/john-julie-gottman/
2. S2 Marriage and Couples - Research. The Gottman Institute. https://www.gottman.com/about/research/couples/
3. S3 The Magic Relationship Ratio, According to Science. The Gottman Institute (Kyle Benson). https://www.gottman.com/blog/the-magic-relationship-ratio-according-science/
4. S4 Can You Really Predict the Success of a Marriage in 15 Minutes?. Slate (Laurie Abraham). https://slate.com/human-interest/2010/03/a-dissection-of-john-gottman-s-love-lab.html
5. S5 The Art and Science of Love - Online. The Gottman Institute. https://www.gottman.com/product/the-art-and-science-of-love-online/
6. S6 The Art and Science of Love - Virtual Event. The Gottman Institute. https://www.gottman.com/product/the-art-and-science-of-love-virtual-event/
7. S7 Gottman Card Decks. Apple App Store. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/gottman-card-decks/id1292398843
8. S8 This One Thing is the Biggest Predictor of Divorce. The Gottman Institute (Eva Van Prooyen). https://www.gottman.com/blog/this-one-thing-is-the-biggest-predictor-of-divorce/
9. S9 The Effectiveness of the Gottman Method. The Gottman Institute. https://www.gottman.com/about/research/effectiveness-of-gottman-method/
10. S10 Shooting down B.S. claims about divorce predictions, part 2. Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science (Andrew Gelman blog). https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2010/03/13/shooting_down_b/

See something factually wrong? Request a correction.